昨天，青岛市公安局崂山分局发布警情通报：海之恋公园辱骂女游客一案，已立案开展全面调查，违法行为人已到案，将依法处理并及时向社会公布。    The origin of the bloody conflict happening in Gaza and Israel is complicated given the long, disputed history of the region, according to experts who have spent decades studying the region.As the attacks continue in both countries, the experts fear that any attempts at truly achieving peace between the Palestinians and Israelis may have been pushed back heavily.Susannah Heschel, the chair of the Jewish Studies Program at Dartmouth University, who has written several books about this region, told ABC News that the conflicts run deep and as far back as the Middle Ages, but specifically, the most modern clashes have stemmed from the fallout of the 1967 Arab-Israeli war.

On ABC News Live at 8:30 pm on Thursday, Oct. 12, ABC News' James Longman, Matt Gutman and Ian Pannell look at the horrendous toll from Hamas' massacre, the Israelis and Palestinians caught in the middle and what comes next.

The war, known in Israel as the Six-Day War, ended with Israel gaining control of several territories, including the Gaza Strip, and that has led to the violence and political fallout that has befallen the area currently, Heschel, the school's Eli M. Black Distinguished Professor of Jewish Studies, said."What we are seeing today is the consequence of that war, or how the various parties to that war …responded to the end," she told ABC News.Following its battles with Egypt, Lebanon, Syria and Jordan, Israel touted its swift victory and new territory, which included lands with long historical significance to Israeli Jews, Heschel, who is teaching a course on the war this semester, said.At the same time, Israel had to deal with an influx of Arabs who now lived under its control, and the retaliation from the neighboring countries who still disputed Israel's claims over the land, she said."The question is, was that victory in fact in some way not a victory? Because the consequence of it was an enormous headache for Israel," Heschel said.Israel has been the target of several military excursions by the nations in that war, particularly Egypt, to try and regain some of that land including during the 1973 Arab-Israeli War, known in Israel as the Yom Kippur War. Egypt would eventually regain the Sinai Peninsula in 1982, following an agreement it signed with Israel three years prior.Gaza, however, remained under Israeli control and tensions continued to flare between Palestinians and Israelis who had begun constructing settlements in the region.The tensions came to a turning point in 1987 during the First Intifada, or "uprising," when Palestinians started to violently rebel against Israeli forces and civilians. It was during this time that Hamas emerged and began to stage violent strikes against Israeli forces.Chuck Freilich, a former deputy national security adviser in Israel and long-time senior fellow at Harvard's Kennedy School, told ABC News that Hamas' stance is simply to "wipe Israel off the map," and it has suppressed anyone within the Palestinian community who doesn't adhere to that."It's not a question of recognition," he said.By the time the Intifada ended in the early 90s, over 1,000 people had been killed, and Gaza was left in ruin from the fighting.Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization would eventually agree to the Oslo Accords in 1993 which granted Palestinians the right to self-government.Heschel said the treaty was a good start but leaders on both sides could have done more to decrease the tensions and violence.Freilich said that the Palestinian Authority, which governed Gaza and continues to govern the West Bank, did try to crack down on terrorism alongside the Israeli government, but it was not always successful and groups like Hamas continued to incite and inflict violence on Israel.In 2000, a Second Intifada began, and hundreds more were hurt and killed in the violent protests. Five years later, the Israeli government voted to withdraw from Gaza and then-Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon expelled 9,480 Jewish settlers from 21 settlements from the region."That withdrawal of the Jewish settlements left some Israeli Jews with the resentment that inflames them to this day," Heschel said.A 2006 election where Hamas became Gaza's leading party has led to increased violence, and a decline in economic resources for its people, as Israel and other nations cut off support. Israel and Egypt imposed a blockade on the coastal strip, which continues to this day."It's unfortunate that Hamas came into power. It's not supported by the majority of the people," Heschel said.Hamas, which contends it is resisting Israel’s oppression of Palestinians, continued to attack Israel in the subsequent years with rockets, kidnappings and other violence leading to major military action by Israel in 2008, 2012, and 2014."It's part of a long-term campaign to repeatedly weaken Israel with conflict after conflict," Freilich said.Freilich added that the recent turmoil within the Israeli government, from its multiple elections in the last six years to the recent turmoil over the changes to its judicial changes, have left Israeli leaders fractured."Their attention was diverted…and we saw the results on Saturday," he said.Last week's attack by Hamas that has killed over 900 Israeli citizens and wounded over 2,300 was unprecedented and puts the region in "uncharted territory," Heschel said.This is the first time in 50 years that civilians were attacked on Israeli soil and it will only lead to more devastation and destruction for both sides, according to the professor."What Hamas did was not to the benefit of the people of Gaza," Heschel said. "Everyone knows, anybody knows and Hamas certainly knew, that in attacking Israel and inflicting so much destruction and murder on Israeli civilians that there would be retaliation."Heschel and Freilich said that it is impossible to determine the long-term ramifications of Hamas' attack and Israel's retaliation, but said that both sides will be living in fear as the violence escalates."To even think that Israel would think at this point that Israel would include a peace process with [Hamas] is totally unrealistic," Freilich said.Even though emotions are high and there is still violence likely to continue for the foreseeable future, Heschel, insisted that Israeli and Palestinian leaders needed to push back against Hamas and its influence and really take time to work out the decades-festering issue over the land."Let's…try to think in clear terms about what we can do for the future so that things can get better," she said. "What's the strategy? Not the strategy for the moment but the strategy for 10, 20, 30 years from now. How can we get there?"。视频里那一幕，让所有跑过步的人都感到脊背发凉！事件回顾8月初，一名内蒙古女游客在海之恋公园拍照。一名男子凑近搭讪："这是个相机吗，多少钱？"游客答"三千多"。男子继续追问什么牌子，游客回"大疆"后轻声提醒："不要影响我拍照"。就是这句再正常不过的拒绝，点燃了对方。男子瞬间变脸："这个拍照有意思吗？你拍照影响我跑步"，勒令游客把相机"拿走"，"这是行人道，滚"。女游客连连道歉："我的错我的错"，对方却步步紧逼、堵住去路，持续辱骂长达5到6分钟。游客慌乱中说"大哥我错了，我给你跪下行吗""大哥我求你了，你放过我行吗"，男子仍怒吼"报警""我今天不可能放过你"。事后该男子还录了道歉视频，自称"在滨海大道跑了20年步的跑步爱好者"，说当天是女游客把拍摄杆放在跑道中央，自己"跑步时有些莽撞"。

别再玷污跑者这件事最刺眼的，不是一次简单的口角，而是当事人把"我在跑步"当成一种特权，你跑步，整条步道都是你的吗？别人连拍照的资格都没有？这行为，不单是对女游客的冒犯，更是对跑者的侮辱！跑步是一项磨炼意志、锤炼体能的运动，大多数跑者都比较自律，比较文明，往往是一些少数人，在玷污跑者的形象。2025年苏州马拉松，2.5万名跑者文明参赛，整座城市以热情和诚意迎接全球跑友，却要为少数人的不文明买单。

B | 公共步道不专属"老熟人"青岛海之恋公园，那条步道十分宽阔，当时周边行人稀少，客观上并没有堵住通行。男子口中的"违规占道"，其实就是情绪暴发之后找出的借口。

C | 公共步道的属性很明确，向所有人开放。

D | 在这里跑步可以，停下来驻足拍照同样也可以。没有任何一条规定写明，这条步道只专供跑步爱好者通行，禁止游客停留取景。男子口中那句"我在这里跑了几十年步"，你是这里的熟人，但不是你的私人领域。

E | 我国2026年1月1日起施行的新修订《治安管理处罚法》第五十条明确规定：公然侮辱他人，处五日以下拘留或者一千元以下罚款；情节较重的，处五日以上十日以下拘留，可以并处一千元以下罚款；以滋扰、纠缠、跟踪等方式干扰他人正常生活的，同样适用该条款。跑者不该背锅我们必须把话说透：青岛这名男子，不能代表跑者。每天清晨在公园、在绿道、在滨江大道上奔跑的数以万计的跑友，绝大多数都是守法、克制、与人为善的。他们让开散步的老人，减速避让嬉闹的孩子，对镜头里的陌生人报以微笑。

F | 青岛在这里跑步的跑者，不该为一个情绪失控者的暴戾买单。正因为跑步圈是一个共同体，每一次"跑者"身份的滥用，都是在消耗整个群体的信用。当一个人借"我在跑步"去霸凌一条公共步道，用"跑步20年"来为辱骂6分钟开脱？跑者不答应！遇到此事怎么办？

出门在外，遇到情绪失控者怎么办？这事也给所有独自出游的人提了个醒：第一，见势不对立刻抽身。对方情绪一上来，停止沟通就是最好的沟通，适当服软不丢人。第二，尽量往人多处靠。一个人出行，要确保自己始终在"被路人看得见"的范围内。第三，悄悄开启录音录像。青岛这起事件之所以能引爆全网、推动警方立案，网传视频就是关键证据。第四，遇到不法侵害，果断报警。幸福者退让是智慧，但不是无底线的退让。青岛海之恋公园这一幕，只是一个例，并不能代表大多数跑者。很多跑者，遇到有人拍照、有人驻足、有人慢悠悠挡在前方，都会放慢脚步，绕过去，微笑一下。这才是跑者真正的样子。